Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 49(4): 1083-1089, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2287363

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of in-person attendance at an academic conference held during the Covid-19 pandemic on the health of the attendees, as assessed based on symptoms such as fever and cough attributed to infection with the Covid-19 virus. METHODS: A questionnaire was used to survey the members of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) about their health during the period from August 7 to August 12, 2022, after the 74th Annual Congress of the JSOG, which was held August 5 to 7. RESULTS: Our survey yielded responses from 3054 members (1566 of whom had attended the congress in person and 1488 of whom had not attended in person); 102 (6.5%) of the in-person attendees and 93 (6.2%) of the people who did not attend in person reported problems with their health. No statistically significant difference was found between these two groups (p = 0.766). In a univariate analysis of factors affecting the presence of health problems, attendees with age ≥60 years had significantly fewer health problems than attendees who were in their 20s (odds ratio: 0.366 [0.167-0.802; p = 0.0120]). In a multivariate analysis, attendees who had received four vaccine shots had significantly fewer health problems than attendees who had received three shots (odds ratio: 0.397 [0.229-0.690, p = 0.0010]). CONCLUSION: Congress attendees who took precautions at the congress to avoid being infected and who had a high vaccination rate did not develop significantly more health problems associated with in-person attendance at the congress.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Oportunidad Relativa , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Congresos como Asunto
2.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 49(7): 1684-1688, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2273135

RESUMEN

As 2 years have passed since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we had an examination of the measures taken at the perinatal medical and child centers during this period at 42 National University Hospital. The first questionnaire survey was conducted during March 17-25, 2022 and the second questionnaire survey was conducted during April 4-30, 2022. For the treatment of pregnant women with COVID-19, a public health center-coordinated triage system had been created and implemented in each region and prefecture. The issues related to the hospital management of pregnant women with COVID-19 include the hindrances to the normal functioning of the center, the limited number of hospital beds and medical care systems as the beds were dedicated to patients with COVID-19, and the problems associated with the mode of delivery. There were no set rules regarding the management of mothers and babies at delivery and thereafter. Initially, cesarean delivery was allowed in almost all cases to reduce the risk of exposure to medical staff. Furthermore, many institutions did not permit expressed breast milk feeding and direct breastfeeding during the quarantine period. The COVID-19 pandemic has been created a shortage of healthcare delivery systems. It is expected that the emergence of new infectious diseases and pandemics will cause the same pressure on systems providing healthcare in the future.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Hospitales , Pandemias , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/terapia , Mujeres Embarazadas , SARS-CoV-2 , Recién Nacido
3.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 21(5): 1816-1821, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1714236

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute inflammatory reactions (AIRs) are a rare complication following esthetic treatment with hyaluronic acid (HA) and/or human collagen fillers. However, a substantial increase in the frequency of AIRs was observed in the first author's clinic since May 2020. AIMS: To report AIR cases, we experienced and discuss potential underlying mechanisms. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients representing AIR symptoms following filler injection with HA or human collagen in our clinic. RESULTS: Although only one case of an AIR with an incidence rate of 0.01% was recorded following filler treatment between September 2008 and April 2020 in our clinic, we observed 14 AIR cases without anaphylaxis, with an incidence rate of 1.18% between May 2020 and June 2021, in line with the spreading of the new coronavirus pandemic. All cases were females aged 40-57 years, and the time of onset was within hours after filler injection. Three patients had been treated with HA fillers only, 2 with HA plus human collagen, and 9 with human collagen only. Most patients had been treated with these products in the past. Nine patients were treated with oral prednisolone. In all cases, symptoms resolved entirely within a week without sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: The marked increase in AIRs coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic. Possible explanations include immune system alterations caused by extensive changes in domestic and personal hygiene, prolonged and elevated stress levels, and subclinical COVID-19 infection. Further studies may be warranted.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Técnicas Cosméticas , Rellenos Dérmicos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Colágeno/efectos adversos , Técnicas Cosméticas/efectos adversos , Rellenos Dérmicos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Ácido Hialurónico/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Masculino , Pandemias
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA